Oppenheimer
Equity research firmAnalyst rating accuracy & track record
Oppenheimer has 14 ranked equity research analysts scored by Quantellect, led by Jason Helfstein at #84 on the leaderboard. As a firm their picks beat their sector 37% of the time and reach their price targets 42% of the time over the following 12 months. Each Q Score is a descriptive research signal, not investment advice.
Track record re-scored weekly
Q Score by analyst
Green analysts have beaten their sector; red have trailed it.
Coverage by sector
282 rated tickers across 7 industry groups.
Coverage & companies analyzed
Analysts at Oppenheimer
Ranked by Q Score| Analyst | Rank | Q Score | Win % | PT-Hit % | Sector-Excess | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Helfstein | #84 | 58 | 45% | 60% | +2.7% | 20 |
| Chris Kotowski | #141 | 47 | 44% | 46% | −0.9% | 30 |
| Noah Kaye | #182 | 42 | 40% | 55% | −2.7% | 20 |
| Colin Rusch | #202 | 39 | 38% | 47% | −3.7% | 27 |
| Bryan Blair | #214 | 37 | 40% | 60% | −4.3% | 22 |
| Francois Brisebois | #215 | 37 | 41% | 27% | −4.5% | 31 |
| Andreas Argyrides | #242 | 31 | 45% | 36% | −6.3% | 22 |
| Jeff Jones | #247 | 30 | 31% | 23% | −6.8% | 40 |
| Ian Zaffino | #289 | 22 | 38% | 56% | −9.2% | 43 |
| Leland Gershell | #307 | 18 | 37% | 29% | −10.6% | 39 |
| Kristen Owen | #330 | 13 | 26% | 37% | −12.2% | 26 |
| Tyler Batory | #354 | 7 | 27% | 40% | −14.4% | 32 |
| Jay Olson | #360 | 4 | 33% | 22% | −15.2% | 25 |
| Scott Schneeberger | #372 | 0 | 28% | 50% | −16.5% | 22 |
Oppenheimer: analyst accuracy FAQ
How accurate are Oppenheimer analysts?
Across 14 ranked analysts, Oppenheimer's rated stocks beat their sector 37% of the time over the next 12 months, and their price targets are reached 42% of the time. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How does Quantellect score analyst accuracy?
We enter each rating at the closing price on or after the call date, with no look-ahead, then measure the 12-month return above the stock's sector ETF and check whether the price target was reached. Scores are shrunk toward the population average and corrected for multiple testing, so they reflect repeatable skill rather than luck.
Analyst ratings and Q Scores are provided for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Scores are estimates derived from publicly published ratings and price targets, marked to end-of-day market data, and may be revised as new calls are published or methodology is updated. Past performance does not guarantee future results.